For a really long time, I have had issues when people discuss that one critical objective of community engagement is to engender trust. I know how trust can be abused and how trust can be build on falsehood. Ask people that have had heartbreaks and they can share with you a lot more stories about how their trust gave room to abuse.
And so I am a complete skeptic about the outcome of community engagement programmes for research and programmes being about engendering trust – for what purpose? So that researchers and public health specialists can get to do what they think they need to do to and for people?
I think the aim of all researchers and public health officials should be to ensure transparency. Transparency would engender trust but then trust is a by product as the focus is transparency.
The relationship between the community, research and public health experts is not a love relationship. So do not ask for trust as an end product.Or then, how to you measure trust as an end product of a community engagement programme? Yes, transparency is measureable and that should be the singular goal. Transparency is good enough; and it gives room for us as community members to objectively make decisions about research and public health programmes.
Trust can make our heart, head and mind blind to realities that sometimes are so obvious. It dulls the brain and mind to danger from trusted fellow. It excuses and allows for fallacies. This is not what we want during community engagement programmes
And please check the Good Participatory Guidelines document developed by UNAIDS and WHO. Trust is not a guiding principle for engagement; transparency is (and was it not so nice hearing Peter Piot referring to this document as a guide for community engagement for research during the just concluded Symposium on Community engagement, communications and technology in ebola clinical trials that held in Dakar on the 20 and 21 of February, 2017). See  transparency as defined by the Good Participatory Guidelines document below.
Open, honest, timely, and clear communication enables transparency and fosters collaborative, trusting, and constructive relationships. Transparency is relevant to the research process as well as to the roles of stakeholders. Transparency about research includes ensuring that stakeholders receive open, honest, and understandable information about the objectives and processes of a trial. Transparency means ensuring that feedback from a broad range of stakeholders is acknowledged and addressed. Transparency about the role of stakeholders includes ensuring that stakeholders are clear on their respective roles and responsibilities; the constituents, if any, they each represent; and the extent to which their input may influence trial-related decisions. Adherence to the principle of transparency means that stakeholders communicate about circumstances that may affect previously agreed levels of consultation, involvement, collaboration, and decision-making