By Morenike Oluwatoyin Folayan

Nigeria has had multiple donor funded projects that can help improve the HIV control landscape in Nigeria. Nigeria is one of the biggest recipients of PEPFAR, the Global Fund and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation grants for HIV control progammes in the world. Have these funded programmes made meaningful changes in the HIV control landscape in Nigeria?

I personally think these projects have made their impact. They have helped build human capacity for development, helped with infrastructural, systems and structure development, and have helped improve our sense of accountability. There are however gaps, the greatest of which I see is a problem of scaling up successful programmes and pushing for programme sustainability.

First, a number of programmes I have been engaged with directly or indirectly do not make active plans for sustainability.

An example is the HIV prevention programme targeting key populations in Nigeria midwived by the Society for Family Health and funded by USAID known as SHiPS for MARPS.

The multi-million dollar project was the first comprehensive HIV prevention programme for key populations in Nigeria. It was indeed well-funded.

It was however quiet clear from my perspective that the design and implementation of the programme was simply to meet the targets of the funders. The heart/desire/drive/motivation of the implementers to ensure sustainability was missing.

Right now, the project is ended with no evidence of country ownership of project or scale-up plans. Once again, this is my critical perspective of what could have been an excellent sustained project addressing the needs of key populations in Nigeria.

The passion for HIV prevention work seems to be a growing gap. HIV prevention programmes seems more or less like duties and work outputs and less so activities to effect change.

Work men and women simply follow the workplans and tick success when indicators for success are achieved. These approaches have helped achieve the results we see till date. However, if we get a lot more passionate about the work we do, we sure will see more impact – scale up and sustainability of programmes. We will likely see more push for government investment in the HIV response.

Passion for HIV prevention work can best be harnessed through engagement of the civil society. Here is where you find passionate people working for change.

Sadly, a growing phenomenon observed in the civil society space is the concept known as CSO-contractors. These are civil society organisations (community-based organisations) set up simply to mop up contract jobs from the multinational non-governmental organisations who contract grassroot work to community based organistions.

These CSO-contractors are so skilled at getting these jobs that the community based organistions run by passionate advocates are staved of work and funds. Advocates are therefore leaving the field to man other things that can bring food to their tables.

This evolution in the field of HIV prevention has significant implications for the field in Nigeria when the donor funds dry up. It is already drying up. Without passionate actors working in the field of HIV prevention, it is clear we will lose the gains we have made thus far as the CSO-contractors will leave the field creating the gap that will undermine our seemingly gained successes.

Support for passionate advocates to work in the field of HIV prevention is needed. Engaging community based organistions run by passionate advocates to be involved with grassroot programming for HIV prevention projects will increase the risk for ensuring programme sustainability as they can do more advocacy and activism work to help institutionalize programmes and projects where they work. Hope we have reading hears.

Folayan is Co-Coordinator of New HIV Vaccine and Microbicide Advocacy Society (NHVMAS) Nigeria.