Nigeria currently living in the early 2002s in their HIV response and the civil society is as docile as a deer
By Brian Kayemba
HIV activists
The Fourth Civil Society Organizations Accountability Forum with the theme “Domestic Resource Mobilization: Increasing Public and Private Sector Investment” was held in Nigeria from the 13 – 15th of November 2018. The conference participants included the Civil Society, politicians, local developmental partners, Society of AIDS in Africa secretariat and the Director General of the National Agency for the Control of AIDS. Advocates for HIV Prevention in Africa (APHA) was invited to share the lessons learnt from the HIV Response in South Africa lessons activism. Treatment Action Campaign shared PowerPoint slides and a video with the delegates.

Presentations from speakers at the conference showed that HIV Financing was predominantly donor-funded with the country expenditure rising from USD299.3m in 2007 to USD632.9m in 2014. The public sector spending rose from USD 43.9m (25.6%) in 2007 to USD 171.2m (27.07%) in 2014.

The Nigeria Federal Government has mobilised state governments to devote 0.5%-1% for HIV programs.

Efforts to achieve universal access to health care due to unstable domestic financing have not borne useful fruits till date though discussions are ongoing. Sadly, in the absence of universal health coverage and currently dwindling in donor funding of the HIV response, a cost sharing mechanism is in place that has led to hospitals introducing ‘User-fees’ for health access for PLHIV – fees that were not being paid prior to dwindling donor investments.

The action for ‘user-fees’ had not been gazetted in parliament. It is therefore an unauthorised and informal out-of-pocket payment made by people living with HIV at the point of service access. This includes payment for consultation fees, medical laboratory tests or other services rendered to either outpatient or in-patient care. This does not include payment for drugs.

Unfortunately, this has affected the local community of people living with HIV. People are failing treatment. For a country with a high burden of HIV infection, the insensitivity of the n authority to the ongoing problems with the introduction of user-fees is defiance to the rights of Its citizens.

Nigeria, by the end of 2017, had 3.1 million people living with HIV and had about 210 000 new infections. The country reported 150,000 AIDS-related deaths in the same year. Only 34% of the 3.1 million are on anti-retroviral treatment.

Of the 220,000 children reported living with HIV, only 26% received antiretroviral treatment.

Access to prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV is in a dire state with only 32% of pregnant women living with HIV receiving ART. As a result, the rate of mother to child transmission has remained high at an estimated 22%. The Universal Goal of 90-90-90 is far from being achievable with the current AIDS response in Nigeria.

Nigeria HIV and AIDS response needs a multi-sectoral response with active engagement of stakeholders working in both the public and private sectors. Nigeria needs to take full ownership of the response not only in terms of funding but also in better coordination, capacity and facilitating greater involvement of local actors in moving the response forward.

The civil society and community stakeholders need to be more active in actualizing the needed change in this country. Unfortunately, active involvement of the civil society in the HIV response is very minimal.

The government has instilled so much fear in the societies. Even demonstrations though legal, can get one arrested and beaten up by the militants. Some Civil Society members, instead of demanding action from the government, are acting as government spokesperson and cover up for the government officials.

The Nigeria Civil Society needs our support as South Africans. It is heartbreaking that access to HIV medicines and access to health care is a luxury in Nigeria.

Nigerians used to say they will need to focus on their own issues, but this is no longer the same. They need helping hands. Civil Society engaged with the global HIV response needs to assist the civil society in Nigeria to enable them acquire a new sense of ownership of the HIV. It is about their lives. They need to get it back.

 

Kayemba wrote in from Advocates for HIV Prevention in Africa, South Africa.