For over four decades, eliminating the AIDS pandemic has been a global concern. Governments, as well as private and public agencies have all joined hands to achieve this goal. This led to-amongst others- the promulgation of the Combination Prevention Approach. Basically, combination prevention programmes engages affected communities, government and ministries, and other stakeholders and sectors in analyzing their local risk factors, underlying causes of vulnerability, and in building a common sense of purpose and mutual accountability for preventing new HIV infections.
Key features of the combination approach include:
(1) They are carefully tailored to national and local needs and conditions- i.e. they are based on current information on the modes of transmission, the populations or groups most at risk of exposure and transmission, and the context that shape their .risk and vulnerability.
(2) They include the strategic mix of structural as well as biomedical and behavioral approaches that are required to meet the needs of those groups, focusing both on their immediate risks and underlying causes of vulnerability. Through structural interventions they create a more enabling environment for prevention action.
(3) They are planned to operate synergistically and consistently over time, on the multiple levels that reinforce or challenge risk behaviour.
(4) They prioritize investments strategically and with the full engagement of affected communities, mobilizing resources in the community, the private sector, government and internationally to achieve needed participation, coverage and continuity.
(5) They require, benefit from, and invest in enhanced partnership and coordination in the design, resourcing and management of programmes, with special attention to investment in decentralized and community responses.
(6) They incorporate sufficient flexibility to permit ongoing assessment, improvement of strategies, and use of new tools and approaches to enable strategies to evolve in response to epidemiological, technological, or social changes.
In Nigeria, the Combination Prevention Approach takes the form of MPPI (Minimum Prevention Package Intervention) which entails the strategic, simultaneous use of different classes of prevention activities (structural, behavioral and biomedical), that operate on multiple levels (individual, community and societal) to respond to the specific needs of particular audiences through engagement of the affected communities.
The Combination Prevention Approach is premised on the philosophy that no single HIV prevention strategy can on its own combat the epidemic. Thus, it is crucial to implement packages that offer a mix of credible high-impact HIV prevention interventions. They include condom provision, Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), Anti-Retroviral Therapy (ART), voluntary medical male circumcision for men, as well as other services for general and key populations. Additionally, people who inject drugs (PWIDs) require additional tools such as harm reduction (needle-syringe and opioid substitution therapy programmes) for effective HIV (and other STIs) prevention.
Combination Prevention aims at sustaining positive impact .ie. reducing the rates of new HIV infections and transmissions in the long-term. It advocates for an integrated approach whereby HIV prevention is not positioned in a single intervention but embraces the coeval use of harmonizing behavioral, biomedical, and structural prevention strategies.
Combination Prevention relies on evidence-informed, strategic, and simultaneous use of complementary behavioral, biomedical and structural prevention strategies.
Combination Prevention Approach takes into account unique behavioral, biomedical, structural, economic, political, legal, social, cultural and other factors of each setting, be it individually, community or society. In Nigeria, several of these factors serve as barriers to the successful implementation of Combination Prevention Approach. For example, poverty and income equality-which falls under the economic factor- could impede one from accessing life saving HIV services. Also, Stigma, low awareness of human rights as well as harmful cultural practices are current challenges to effective implementation of MPPI. Thus, for an effective Combination Prevention Program to take place, these barriers need to be addressed.
In virtually every country were marked progress in preventing new infections have been documented, a combination of structural, behavioral, and biomedical prevention approach has been used. Thus, it is not an exaggeration to state that the Combination Prevention Approach is indeed a response at the right time.